National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
Name Entries
corporateBody
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
Name Components
Name :
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
Name Components
Name :
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
Name Components
Name :
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
NGLTF Abkuerzung
Name Components
Name :
NGLTF Abkuerzung
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
Name Components
Name :
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force (U.S.)
NGLTF
Name Components
Name :
NGLTF
Genders
Exist Dates
Biographical History
Founded in 1973 as the National Gay Task Force, NGLTF is the nation's oldest lesbian and gay civil rights lobby. In 1993, it served 26,000 members. Affiliated components of the Task Force include the Gay Media Task Force, founded to lobby the major television networks to improve their coverage of lesbian and gay issues; the Privacy Project; the Military Freedom Project; the Anti-Violence Project; the Creating Change conference (started in 1988); the Lesbian and Gay Families Project; and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute, founded in 1995 as a separate, non-profit organization to serve as a national information clearinghouse and resource center dedicated to lesbian and gay men's issues. The Policy Institute has published numerous studies and reports, including Paisley Currah and Shannon Minter's "Transgender equality : a handbook for activists and policymakers" in 2000. In 1997, NGLTF changed its mission statement to include bisexual and transgender people and launched the Federation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Statewide Political Organizations.
Historical Note
The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) was founded in 1973 to build and coordinate organizational support for pro-GLBT legislation and legislators, and to oppose anti-GLBT political initiatives. The NGLTF has also engaged in policy analysis, monitoring representations of GLBT individuals in mass media and the social sciences, and supporting research conducive to the interests of the GLBT community.
History
The GLBT community has challenged the legal restriction of marriage to opposite-sex partners since at least 1970, when the Reverend Troy Perry, founder of the predominantly GLBT Metropolitan Community Church, presided over a ceremony between two women, issuing a church marriage certificate that would have exempted the couple from obtaining a marriage license had they been a man and a woman. Other efforts to circumvent the legal restriction were subsequently undertaken in Minnesota (1971), Kentucky (1973), Boulder, Colorado (1975), Washington, DC (1990), and Ithaca, New York (1995).
GLBT efforts to obtain legal recognition of same-sex marriage increased in the decade between 1995 and 2004. In 1996, the Supreme Court of Hawaii's consideration of a measure that would have legalized same-sex marriage in that state created considerable controversy. In response, anti-gay sentiment in the US Congress led to the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which gives states the right to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages enacted in other states and denies federal benefits to same-sex marital partners. The measure passed even though same-sex marriage had not yet been made legal anywhere in the US, and despite the fact that it appeared to pose a conflict with the Constitution's provision for full faith and credit.
Despite the passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the GLBT community's efforts continued, meeting with increasing success:
- In 2000, following a class-action suit begun in 1997, the state of Vermont instituted a form of "civil union", whereby same-sex couples registered as domestic partners gain access to some 300 state benefits and privileges in the areas of inheritance, property transfers, medical decisions, workers' compensation, insurance, and state taxes previously available only to heterosexual married couples.
- On June 26, 2003, the US Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas struck down consensual sodomy laws across the nation. Legal scholars interpreted this decision as providing a foundation for the legalization of same-sex marriage, since without sodomy laws a primary justification for the denial of other civil entitlements (including marriage) could no longer be invoked.
- On September 19, 2003, governor Gray Davis signed into law the California Domestic Partners Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003 (effective January 1, 2005), extending to domestic partnerships virtually all the legal rights and responsibilities of marriage in California.
- On November 13, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional; town clerks began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on May 17, 2004.
- Between February 14 and March 11, 2004 (when forced to cease by court order), the County of San Francisco issued marriage licenses to over 4,000 same-sex couples.
- Between March 3 and April 20, 2004 (when forced to cease by court order), Multnomah County, Oregon, issued marriage licenses to 3,022 same-sex couples.
Religious and social conservatives were alarmed by these developments, which they saw as a "capitulation" to the "homosexual agenda" and a threat to "order and morality". In response, they succeeded in having constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage placed on ballots in 13 states-Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah-in the general election year of 2004 (Louisiana and Missouri voted on the amendments in the spring; the remaining states voted on them on November 2). Despite the efforts of the GLBT community against the amendments, in particular in Oregon (where the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force contributed more than $900,000 in cash and kind, and the Human Rights Campaign spent another $514,000), the amendments passed easily in all 13 states. The issue of "family values" energized evangelical Christians and the political right, and many political analysts believe that these voters tilted the vote in hotly contested Ohio to George W. Bush, ensuring him a second term.
eng
Latn
External Related CPF
https://viaf.org/viaf/124407096
https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n85274932
https://id.loc.gov/authorities/n85274932
Other Entity IDs (Same As)
Sources
Loading ...
Resource Relations
Loading ...
Internal CPF Relations
Loading ...
Languages Used
Subjects
African American gays
African American lesbians
AIDS (Disease)
AIDS (Disease)
AIDS (Disease)
AIDS (Disease)
Bisexuals
Gay and lesbian rights
Gay liberation movement
Gay liberation movement
Gay men
Gay rights
Gay rights
Gays
Gender identity
Homophobia
Homosexuality
Homosexuality
Homosexuality
Homosexuality
Lesbians
Lesbians
Same-sex marriage
Sex discrimination
Sexual orientation
Transsexuals
Violence
Nationalities
Activities
Occupations
Legal Statuses
Places
United States
AssociatedPlace
United States
AssociatedPlace
Convention Declarations
<conventionDeclaration><citation>VIAF</citation></conventionDeclaration>