Seattle (Wash.). Neighborhood Planning Office
Name Entries
corporateBody
Seattle (Wash.). Neighborhood Planning Office
Name Components
Name :
Seattle (Wash.). Neighborhood Planning Office
NPO
Name Components
Name :
NPO
Genders
Exist Dates
Biographical History
The Neighborhood Planning Office (NPO) was established in 1995 as a direct result of the City's adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The plan required development of neighborhood plans within four years to improve the quality of life consistent with neighborhood goals and City policies. The neighborhood plans were development through a collaborative process involving City planning staff and neighborhood associations. The NPO was sunset in December 1998 and its functions were transferred to the Department of Neighborhoods which is now responsible for facilitating, monitoring, and coordinating implementation of the adopted plans.
The Neighborhood Planning Office (NPO) was created in 1994 to implement the goals of the comprehensive plan for neighborhood planning. The office began work in Jan. 1994 with a goal of creating thirty neighborhood plans in four years. The program was extended for a fifth year, after which the office was folded into the Dept. of Neighborhoods (DON). Throughout the planning process the NPO worked with the Office of Management and Planning (OMP) and DON. Each neighborhood was assigned a staff member to oversee the planning process, and consultants were hired to facilitate communication between community members. Areas of priority were urban centers, manufacturing and industrial centers, urban villages, and distressed areas. The planning process was broken into three steps: pre-application, Phase I, and Phase II. Work on the pre-application for funding included creating an organizing committee, setting neighborhood boundaries, developing planning guidelines, and developing neighborhood profiles and maps. Phase I included outreach to community members, organizations, and businesses to organize and discuss the state of the neighborhood, writing a community vision statement listing the values and goals of the neighborhood, and creating a planning committee to lead Phase II. The results of Phase I were reviewed by the community in a validation step to ensure that the community as a whole was represented in what would become the basis of the scope of work for Phase II. Phase II consisted of planning and developing projects and putting the plan through the validation process. The final plans, subject to environmental review to ensure compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), were submitted to the City Council for review, approval, and adoption. Once approved, projects were prioritized for funding.
The Neighborhood Planning Office (NPO) was established in 1995 as a direct result of Seattle's adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The plan required development of neighborhood plans within four years to improve the quality of life consistent with neighborhood goals and city policies. The neighborhood plans were developed through a collaborative process involving city planning staff and neighborhood associations. The NPO was sunset in Dec. 1998 and its functions were transferred to the Dept. of Neighborhoods which is now responsible for facilitating, monitoring, and coordinating implementation of the adopted plans. The tool kits were created by the Neighborhood Planning Office in 1997 to help groups create their city-approved neighborhood plans. The kits gathered together information about city services and programs from a variety of departments.
The Neighborhood Planning Office (NPO) was created in 1994 to implement the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for neighborhood planning. The office began work in January 1995 with a goal of creating 30 neighborhood plans in four years. The program was extended for a fifth year and the NPO closed June 30, 1999, after which its functions were folded into the Department of Neighborhoods (DON). Throughout the planning process the NPO worked with the Office of Management and Planning (OMP) and DON. Each neighborhood was assigned a staff member to oversee the planning process, and consultants were hired to facilitate communication between community members. Areas of priority were urban centers, manufacturing and industrial centers, urban villages, and distressed areas.
The planning process was broken into three steps: pre-application, Phase I, and Phase II. Work on the pre-application for funding included creating an Organizing Committee, setting neighborhood boundaries, developing planning guidelines, and developing neighborhood profiles and maps.
Phase I included outreach to community members, organizations, and businesses to organize and discuss the state of the neighborhood, writing a community vision statement listing the values and goals of the neighborhood, and creating a Planning Committee to lead Phase II. The results of Phase I were reviewed by the community in a validation step to ensure that the community as a whole was represented in what would become the basis of the scope of work for Phase II.
Phase II consisted of planning and developing projects and putting the plan through the validation process. The final plans, subject to environmental review to ensure compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), were submitted to the City Council for review, approval, and adoption. Once approved, projects were prioritized for funding.
Karma Ruder, former director of the Neighborhood Planning Office, holds bachelor's degrees in human relations and philosophy and a master's degree in public administration from the University of Kansas. Ms. Ruder was named a Distinguished Citizen by former Mayor Paul Schell in 1999. She now works as the Director of Community Collaboration at the Center for Ethical Leadership.
Source: http://www.ethicalleadership.org
The Neighborhood Planning Office (NPO) was created in 1994 to implement the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for neighborhood planning. The office began work in January 1995 with a goal of creating 30 neighborhood plans in four years. The program was extended for a fifth year and the NPO closed June 30, 1999, after which its functions were folded into the Department of Neighborhoods (DON). Throughout the planning process the NPO worked with the Office of Management and Planning (OMP) and DON. Each neighborhood was assigned a staff member to oversee the planning process, and consultants were hired to facilitate communication between community members. Areas of priority were urban centers, manufacturing and industrial centers, urban villages, and distressed areas.
The planning process was broken into three steps: pre-application, Phase I, and Phase II. Work on the pre-application for funding included creating an Organizing Committee, setting neighborhood boundaries, developing planning guidelines, and developing neighborhood profiles and maps.
Phase I included outreach to community members, organizations, and businesses to organize and discuss the state of the neighborhood, writing a community vision statement listing the values and goals of the neighborhood, and creating a Planning Committee to lead Phase II. The results of Phase I were reviewed by the community in a validation step to ensure that the community as a whole was represented in what would become the basis of the scope of work for Phase II.
Phase II consisted of planning and developing projects and putting the plan through the validation process. The final plans, subject to environmental review to ensure compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), were submitted to the City Council for review, approval, and adoption. Once approved, projects were prioritized for funding.
eng
Latn
External Related CPF
https://viaf.org/viaf/151586686
https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-no98095395
https://id.loc.gov/authorities/no98095395
Other Entity IDs (Same As)
Sources
Loading ...
Resource Relations
Loading ...
Internal CPF Relations
Loading ...
Languages Used
Subjects
Ballard (Seattle, Wash.)
Baseball Field
Beacon Hill (Seattle, Wash.)
Bitter Lake (Seattle, Wash.)
Broadview (Seattle, Wash.)
Capitol Hill (Seattle, Wash.)
Central District (Seattle, Wash.)
Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
Cities and towns Growth
City and town life
City planning
Civic Activism
Civic improvement
Civic improvement
Columbia City (Seattle, Wash.)
Community development
Crown Hill (Seattle, Wash.)
Denny Regrade (Seattle, Wash.)
Duwamish (Wash.)
Eastlake (Seattle, Wash.)
First Hill (Seattle, Wash.)
Fremont (Seattle, Wash.)
Georgetown (Seattle, Wash.)
Politics and government
Green Lake (Seattle, Wash.)
Greenwood (Seattle, Wash.)
Historic preservation
Housing
Interagency coordination
Lake City (Seattle, Wash.)
Land use
Land use
Lighting
Lighting
Municipal budget
Municipal government
Municipal services
Municipal services
Neighborhood
Neighborhood planning
Neighborhood planning
Northgate (Seattle, Wash.)
Open space
Parks
Parks
Partnership
Phinney Ridge (Seattle, Wash.)
Pine Street (Seattle, Wash.)
Pioneer Square (Seattle, Wash.)
Planning transportation
Population
Public art
Queen Anne (Seattle, Wash.)
Rainier Beach (Seattle, Wash.)
Regional planning
Reservoirs
Reservoirs
Roosevelt (Seattle, Wash.)
Seattle
South Park (Seattle, Wash.)
Street railroads
Sustainable development
Transportation
Transportation
University District (Seattle, Wash.)
Urban policy
Wallingford (Seattle, Wash.)
West Seattle (Seattle, Wash.)
Zoning
Nationalities
Activities
Occupations
Legal Statuses
Places
Seattle (Wash.)
AssociatedPlace
Seattle (Wash.)
AssociatedPlace
Washington (State)--Seattle
AssociatedPlace
Seattle (Wash.)
AssociatedPlace
Seattle (Wash.)
AssociatedPlace
Seattle (Wash.)
AssociatedPlace
Washington (State)--Seattle
AssociatedPlace
Seattle (Wash.)
AssociatedPlace
Convention Declarations
<conventionDeclaration><citation>VIAF</citation></conventionDeclaration>