Los Angeles Unified School District
Name Entries
corporateBody
Los Angeles Unified School District
Name Components
Name :
Los Angeles Unified School District
Lincoln-Wilson High School
Name Components
Name :
Lincoln-Wilson High School
Fairfax-Hollywood High School
Name Components
Name :
Fairfax-Hollywood High School
King Drew Medical Magnet High School
Name Components
Name :
King Drew Medical Magnet High School
Hamilton-Palisades-University Cluster
Name Components
Name :
Hamilton-Palisades-University Cluster
LAUSD Narbonne San Pedro Cluster
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD Narbonne San Pedro Cluster
LAUSD
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD
LAUSD Eagle Rock Franklin Marshall Cluster
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD Eagle Rock Franklin Marshall Cluster
South Gate High School
Name Components
Name :
South Gate High School
Los Angeles City Schools
Name Components
Name :
Los Angeles City Schools
Manual Arts High School
Name Components
Name :
Manual Arts High School
South Gate Middle School
Name Components
Name :
South Gate Middle School
LAUSD Garfield
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD Garfield
LAUSD Gardena Washington Cluster
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD Gardena Washington Cluster
Robert F Kennedy Community Schools
Name Components
Name :
Robert F Kennedy Community Schools
LAUSD Jordan Locke Cluster
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD Jordan Locke Cluster
Los Angeles City Unified School District
Name Components
Name :
Los Angeles City Unified School District
LAUSD Venice Westchester Cluster
Name Components
Name :
LAUSD Venice Westchester Cluster
John C Fremont High School
Name Components
Name :
John C Fremont High School
Genders
Exist Dates
Biographical History
Crawford et al. v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles et al. was a case in which the California Supreme Court ordered the Los Angeles Unified School District to formulate a feasible plan to desegregate its schools. In 1977 the LAUSD came up with a plan that was later deemed one of if not the most drastic plans of mandatory student reassignment in the nation. The board proposed a desegregation busing plan which would be implemented in 1978. In response to the proposal the group Bustop Inc. filed two lawsuits which were petitioned to the United States Supreme Court to stop the enforced busing plan. Both lawsuits were titled Bustop, Inc. v. Los Angeles Board of Education and the Supreme Court denied both petitions. Following the proposed busing plan, California voters ratified California Constitutional Proposition 1 to stop mandatory pupil reassignment and busing within the LAUSD unless the reassignment was mandated by a federal court to remedy a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Federal Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. The proposition passed in 1979 with 70% of the vote. In 1982, the Supreme Court heard the case and the Court agreed that Proposition 1 did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
Historical note
Crawford et al. v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles et al. was a case in which the California Supreme Court ordered the Los Angeles Unified School District to formulate a feasible plan to desegregate its schools. In 1977 the LAUSD came up with a plan that was later deemed one of if not the most drastic plans of mandatory student reassignment in the nation. The board proposed a desegregation busing plan which would be implemented in 1978. In response to the proposal the group Bustop Inc. filed two lawsuits which were petitioned to the United States Supreme Court to stop the enforced busing plan. Both lawsuits were titled Bustop, Inc. v. Los Angeles Board of Education and the Supreme Court denied both petitions.
Following the proposed busing plan, California voters ratified California Constitutional Proposition 1 to stop mandatory pupil reassignment and busing within the LAUSD unless the reassignment was mandated by a federal court to remedy a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Federal Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. The proposition passed in 1979 with 70% of the vote. In 1982, the Supreme Court heard the case and the Court agreed that Proposition 1 did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
eng
Latn
External Related CPF
https://viaf.org/viaf/262046637
https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n80087720
https://id.loc.gov/authorities/n80087720
Other Entity IDs (Same As)
Sources
Loading ...
Resource Relations
Loading ...
Internal CPF Relations
Loading ...
Languages Used
Subjects
Education
Education
Child mental health services
Child mental health services
Law reporting
Mental health planning
Mental health planning
School integration
School integration
School integration
School mental health services
School mental health services
School social work
Segregation in education
Segregation in education
Student counselors
Nationalities
Americans
Activities
Occupations
Legal Statuses
Places
California--Los Angeles
AssociatedPlace
Los Angeles (Calif.)
AssociatedPlace
Los Angeles (Calif.)
AssociatedPlace
California--Los Angeles
AssociatedPlace
Convention Declarations
<conventionDeclaration><citation>VIAF</citation></conventionDeclaration>